|
Women must unite
to survive

Ethel da Costa
courtesy: Insight O Heraldo, Goa
submitted by
the author to TGF on January 12, 2002
What is the difference between
chudiyan and kadas? Both are arm ornaments – the former worn by women, the
latter by men. Only, bangles are looked upon as a sign of weakness, while
kadas, on the other hand, denote masculinity, a sign of strength and power. In
the interpretation of a simple piece of body decorating jewelry, lies the
issue of justice, prejudice and equality.
For example, when Muslim governed countries –like the Taliban –commits untold
atrocities against its women under the cloak of religion, the rest of the
world gasps and covers its mouth in horror. When it happens in a
democratically run country like India, we look the other way.
A recent report from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) drives home a
very subtle, but alarming point. The findings of the report suggest an
unhealthy, imbalance in the male-female population ratio in the states of
Haryana and Punjab, not because the men and women of these two states have
come of age – you know, let’s make love but not babies. But, because of the
hugely popular practice of selective sex abortion.
The report, based on the 2001 census also shows that the malady is not the
problem of the illiterate, backward class, but a phenomenon of the upwardly
mobile class of people. The educated, monied class were systematically getting
rid of their unborn girls, because they were still perceived to be a burden on
the family. This burden was expensive to maintain, which had to be gotten rid
off by paying huge sums of dowry!!
Appalling? Sure. Are we in the 21st century for real?
In most parts of India – Goa is still no better if you sincerely ask me – sons
are looked upon as natural heirs (even if they are no good vagabonds) in
property and religious matters. Girls – no matter how talented, versatile and
capable – are considered as liabilities.
So, why spend on their higher education or polishing their talent, because,
anyway, they have to leave the house and go set up home with somebody else?
Girls are investments to be written off. (Bless those few parents who treat
sons and daughters equal).
The recent census conducted on Goa too shows an alarming imbalance in the
male-female population ratio. Let me do a reality check: As on March 1, 2001,
Goa’s population stood at 13,43,998 comprising 6,85,617 males to 6,58,381
females. The population of North Goa was 3,88,116 males and 3,69,291 females,
and that of South Goa 2,97,501 males and 2,80,090 females.
There is more truth: The sex-ratio i.e. number of females per thousand males
for Goa works out to 960 in 2001 as compared to 967 in 1991.
The scales are tipping heavily against women, who are today less in number as
compared to males. Could I even dare to guess why?
And mind you, Goa is looked upon as a progressive, educated, literate,
cosmopolitan state with a high per capita income, second to Delhi. Our women
are perceived to enjoy equal status, economically (even though if this is a
myth), and are considered socially better off, than say, women in Bihar.
So, are we making less babies, because we have suddenly discovered the `power
of the condom,’ or it is because enlightenment has finally dawned on our purse
strings and wallets?
If the census is to believed, Goa’s present rate of growth of population is
down by 1.19%, when compared with 16.08% recorded between 1981-1991.
The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act (1972) and Prenatal Diagnostic
Techniques Regulation and Prevention of Misuse Act (1994) were put into force
so as to deter malpractices of selective foeticide. Sad to say, but a doctor
previously attached to the Goa Medical College confided to me that the same
acts were misused by unscrupulous doctors, who were interested in making a
side, fast buck, by misusing the law to determine the sex of the foetus. If it
was female, and the parents were agreeable, the baby was destroyed.
A Goan activist, who went undercover as an expectant mother, to learn the
truth, came back enraged when she was told that the doctor could conduct the
abortion, if the foetus was a girl.
So much for our religious and moral fallacies!!
Unfortunately, I see a dangerous trend in these findings. A trend that will –
in the years to come – veer towards an increase in atrocities against women by
way of increasing crime against women. Because, with less women around, who
and where will the men go to?
As it is, women in Goa and elsewhere are still a disadvantaged lot when it
comes to property, social justice and economic equality. It is a myth that
women in Goa are a better lot despite the presence of the Uniform Civil Code.
A lawyer tells me that women in Goa are not even aware of their rights, forget
exercise them, since they have been mentally conditioned to stay ignorant. Add
on the social pressures and you have a bomb that defuses even before it can
explode.
So, what’s the silver lining here in this anti-female story? What I have been
saying all along – and I’m hoarse now baby – that only a change in attitude
can bring about the betterment of our society.
The change HAS to start with the WOMEN. An independent thinking change in
mindsets, at a deeper subconscious level. The key to this puzzle is in the
hands of women only. Men come and go, it is the women who can work for the
betterment of other women. We have to keep the men aside – or better still,
mould them to co-operate – by taking the weapon of decision-making into our
hands, beginning from the home. It is only women who can understand what other
women need. This task cannot be left with NGOs. It has to start with US.
However, my experience with some of the women I know is hardly encouraging.
Governed by their environment, women within the FAMILY sometimes are
conditioned not to support other women. Family politics plays a big role in
celebrating faults and misfortunes, however wide maybe their social circles or
academic achievements.
With women like these still amongst us, no wonder Indian families still prefer
the male child over the girl child. Unless we change our attitude and look
towards the future, much hope cannot be pumped into a system that needs a
fresh lease of leaders, ideas and attitudes. Can we motivate ourselves to
initiate this change?
Ethel da Costa
January 12, 2002
Back to Ethel da Costa
sez
Back to Front Page
|